Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Please drop illustrative use of 'en-boont'

From: "Addison Phillips" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:24:45 -0800

That's a good idea. Unless somebody objects I'll replace examples in the draft that use Boontling to use Scouse instead. It is a better example for the reasons John pointed out (although we don't have that many subtags to choose from).

Best Regards,

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of Frank Ellermann
> Sent: mardi 22 mars 2005 07:08
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: Please drop illustrative use of 'en-boont'
> 
> John Cowan wrote:
> 
> > In the nature of things, language variants tend to be
> > little-known to those who don't speak the language in
> > question, and sometimes even if they do.
> 
> Maybe en-scouse is a better example.  Or no-bok for the
> case of a now deprecated tag.
> 
>                          Bye, Frank
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru