Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Compatibilities

From: "Addison Phillips" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:58:18 -0700

RFC 3066 does not permit what you desire (dots or long subtags) under any reading you can possibly imagine.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of r&d afrac
> Sent: 2005?7?14? 19:29
> To: Randy Presuhn; LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibilities
> 
> At 03:06 15/07/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> >Hi Jefsey -
> >If you disagree with the material on compatibility (which has been in the
> >i-d in various forms for a *long* time),
> 
> I know, Addison claimed that.
> 
> >then it is up to you to propose text.
> 
> You want me to add text to remove all the added text???
> You should know now that the best compatibility I advise is to stay with
> RFC 3066  and its lose application.
> What also permits the addition of the Draft.
> 
> Have a good night!
> jfc
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru