Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18

From: "Peter Constable" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 20:17:51 -0700

I'm OK with this in principle. One question: would it be clear if no
prefix field is included that the intent is that the variant is generic
and could be included with any prefix (as opposed to the requester
simply forgot or didn't bother)?

Peter Constable

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
Of
> Mark Davis
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 3:44 PM
> To: John.Cowan
> Cc: Frank Ellermann; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: At least one prefix for variant (GenArt) #18
> 
> +1
> 
> John.Cowan wrote:
> > Addison Phillips scripsit:
> >
> >
> >>Variant subtags are /*usually*/ registered for use with a particular
> >>range of language tags. For example, the subtag 'rozaj' is intended
> >>for use with language tags that start with the primary language
> >>subtag "sl", since Resian is a dialect of Slovenian. Thus the subtag
> >>'rozaj' /* would be appropriate */ in tags such as "sl-Latn-rozaj"
or
> >>"sl-IT-rozaj". This information is stored in the "Prefix" field in
> >>the registry. Variant registration requests /* SHOULD */ include at
> >>least one "Prefix" field in the registration form.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru