Subject: Re: [manet] #17: Proposed Reactive Protocols' Alternative Message Formats

From: "Charles E. Perkins" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:20:24 -0700

Hello folks,

The changes have been made without any undue difficulty, and
no complaints have been brought to the attention of the mailing
list.  I think this issue can safely be closed now.

Regards,
Charlie P.

On 2/20/2013 11:11 AM, manet issue tracker wrote:
> #17: Proposed Reactive Protocols' Alternative Message Formats
>
> Changes (by [email-masked]):
>
>   * owner:  Abdussalam Baryun => [email-masked]
>   * status:  new => assigned
>
>
> Comment:
>
>   The new TLVs suggested by Henning Rogge have been incorporated into the
>   upcoming new revision for the AODVv2 specification.  I think it will
>   resolve this issue.  The Address TLVs have the effect of disambiguating
>   the roles of the addresses in the !AddrBlk; consequently the roles of the
>   addresses do not require positional significance otherwise.  After the
>   publication of the new revision, it should be determined whether this
>   issue can be closed.
>

-- 
Regards,
Charlie P.