Subject: Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (5446)

From: "John R Levine" <[email-masked]>
Date: 30 Jul 2018 11:21:33 -0400

He's right, we got them confused on that line.  Suggest hold for update.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
> "An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5446
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Martijn van der Lee <[email-masked]>
>
> Section: B.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Authentication-Results: mail.example.com;
>                  spf=fail smtp.mail=[email-masked]
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Authentication-Results: mail.example.com;
>                  spf=fail smtp.mail=[email-masked]
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The TLD of the spammer's emailaddress should be `.net` as in the rest of the example.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
> Publication Date    : August 2010
> Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, [email-masked], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly