Subject: Re: suggested path and arch

From: Luis Bruno <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:06:14 +0100

Bob Atkinson wrote:
> TXT is not a prototyping notion here; it's the mainstream deployment
> option. [...] there's no point to a dedicated RR type
> 
> You've missed the arguments

Maybe I'm being overly dense, but I've been diving into the archives
and I may have missed the arguments too.

You and Jim Lyon have justified the need for a temporary representation
in TXT; please correct me if I'm wrong.

Cheers,
-- 
Luis Bruno                                UTM: 29T 629481E 4511776N 576m