Subject: Re: ToneGen...CPTGen

From: Sandeep Gautam <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:39:10 +0530

Extending this ...if CPtdet, Dtmfdet and Tonedet are active on the same
termination, then tonedet/std(toneid=*) would enable detection of tones in CPT
as well as DTMF. Is this the intended behaviour?

Or do we assume that although '*' is defined in tonedet, but as no toneids are
defined in that package, hence tonedet/std(toneid=*) is non-sensical and will
not enable detection of any tones?

Regards,
Sandy G

"Marcello Pantaleo (EED)" <[email-masked]> on 16/01/2001
18:02:52

Please respond to "Marcello Pantaleo (EED)" <[email-masked]>

To:   [email-masked]
cc:    (bcc: Sandeep Gautam/HSS)

Subject:  Re: ToneGen...CPTGen

As stated in E.4: "If tl is "wild card", any tone id is detected".
So tonedet/std(toneid=*) will enable detection of all events in CPT det.
/Marcello

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandeep Gautam [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:35 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: ToneGen...CPTGen

Thanx Christian,
Now, supposing that CPtdet and ToneDet are on the same termination, and MGC
sends, tonedet (toneid=*).
What would be the behaviour of MG? Will it enable detection and reporting of all
events (tone ids) defined in CPT det package? If not, then what events can be
potentially detected with this command?

Thanx and regards,
Sandy G

Christian Groves <[email-masked]> on 16/01/2001 05:28:40

To:   Sandeep Gautam/HSS@HSS
cc:   [email-masked]

Subject:  Re: ToneGen...CPTGen

G'Day Sandy,

The Tonedet package makes explicit mention that "*" can be used in the
detection case.

Christian

Sandeep Gautam wrote:
>
> What would be the behaviour in case of tonedet/std(toneid=*) ? remeber that
tone
> id * is defined in the tonedet package. Will it be similarly lead to an error
> generation?
>
> The exaple is same as below, with tonedet and CPT det substituted.
>
> Is the consensus that tonegen/antyhting and tonedet/anything doesnt make sense
> and hence will never be used between the MG and MGC?
>
> Thanx.
> Regards,
> Sandy G
>
> Christian Groves <[email-masked]> on 15/01/2001 09:28:54
>
> Please respond to Christian Groves <[email-masked]>
>
> To:   [email-masked]
> cc:    (bcc: Sandeep Gautam/HSS)
>
> Subject:  Re: ToneGen...CPTGen
>
> G'Day Chan,
>
> If the MGC applies tonegen/playtone(toneid=dial tone) then you should
> get an error. The MGC has to use CPTGEN package if it wants to play
> toneid= dial tone.
>
> Cheers, Christian
>
> Chanchal Hassija wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > CPTGen package extends ToneGen package.
> >
> > If MGC applies a signal - tonegen/playtone(toneid=dial tone), and the
> > termination has ToneGen as well as CPT gen loaded, should the MG invoke
> > CPTGEN/playtone{ toneid=dial tone}. Is this not invalid since
ToneId=DialTone
> is
> > not a valid parameter for the Base-Package and hence MGC can't refer to what
> is
> > valid in extended package only, by using BasePackageId.
> >
> > Thanks for your time
> >
> > Chan....