Subject: RE: IVR pacakge

From: "Tom-PT Taylor" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:02:15 -0400

To some extent I think this is an implementation decision, but I think Annex
M gives greater control over the operation compared with having an IVR
termination and using a separate RTSP channel to control it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sarika Gupta [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:55 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: IVR pacakge
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Can anybody tell if for the implementation of IVR on
> MG, the IVR will be treated as a separate termination.
> Or simply applying the signals specified in the H248
> Annex M on the physical terminations will serve the
> purpose.
> 
> Regards
> Sarika
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>