Subject: RE: Notifications

From: "Tom-PT Taylor" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:12:58 -0400

The basic point is reasonable.  We should look carefully at the case where
an errorDescriptor is returned because of a full buffer.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Winter Johannes [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:19 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Notifications
> 
> 
> Hi List,
> 
> I have a short question about notifications sent from the MG 
> to the MGC: 
> 
> The communication between MGC and MG is always realized by 
> the exchange of
> Transaction Request messages (sent by the MGC) and Transaction Reply
> messages (sent by the MG).  The Transaction messages include the
> corresponding Command Requests and Replys. 
> 
> Is this the same for notifications sent by the MG to the MGC? 
> So, does the MG set up a Transaction request (including a 
> NotifyRequest,
> Annex A)  with a Transaction ID and receive a corresponding 
> Transaction
> reply (with a NotifyReply, optional an empty SEQUENCE) from the MGC? 
> 
> If this is true, should section 7.2.7 not changed to:
> 
> ...
> [TerminationID]
> [,ErrorDescriptor]
> 	Notify (TerminationID,
> 		ObservedEventsDescriptor,
> 		[ErrorDescriptor])
> ...
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> Johannes Winter
> Siemens AG Austria
> 
>