Subject: [mif] Issue #13: Use case #10 is self-referential

From: Margaret Wasserman <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 07:31:59 -0500

This issue claims that use case #10 is logically invalid.

In my opinion, it is true that use case #10 (as written) is self-referential and non-sensical.  

My proposed resolution is that use case #10 should be removed, unless someone can explain what it was meant to say...

Thoughts?
Margaret