Subject: [mif] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt

From: Stjepan Groš <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:34:41 +0100

Hi everyone!

We did an analysis of Huawei's IPR claim and wrote a draft about our
findings.  In the end, our opinion is that this IPR doesn't matter. But
in worst case it only partially covers what MIF did. Anyway, we are not
lawyers and would appreciate a feedback.

SG

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	New Version Notification for
draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
Date: 	Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:24:22 -0800
From: 	[email-masked]
To: 	Leonardo Jelenkovic <[email-masked]>, Dejan Skvorc
<[email-masked]>, Stjepan Gros <[email-masked]>

A new version of I-D, draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Stjepan Gros and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis
Revision:	00
Title:		DHCP configuration in MIF and associated IPR claim
Document date:	2015-11-23
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		11
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00

Abstract:
   The purpose of this draft is to analyze different options on how DHCP
   can be used to configure PvD aware client.  This is done in light of
   IPR claim made by Huawei and the necessity to find an option for
   implementation.  In order for an option to be selected it obviously
   must not interfere with IPR, or, IPR has to be somehow invalidated.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat