Subject: Re: [mif] New Version Notification for draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt

From: Margaret Cullen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:33 -0500

Hi Stjepan,

While it is your prerogative to write a draft about anything you like, it is not the job of an IETF WG to determine the validity of any IPR claims that is made against a WG document.  The IPR claim exists, and it is up to each individual company to determine how/if any IPR claim does or does not apply to that company's implementation of any specification.  In this case, the IPR holder has only made an IPR claim against the MIF MPVD DHCP option document.

The first question for the MIF WG in this situation is whether we want to continue to work on the MPVD DHCP option given the IPR claim or not.  That question is the subject of a separate consensus call to the list (Subject: Consensus to drop MIF mpvd dhcp document), and any comment on that question should be made in that thread.

Margaret

On Nov 23, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Stjepan Groš <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi everyone!
> 
> We did an analysis of Huawei's IPR claim and wrote a draft about our findings.  In the end, our opinion is that this IPR doesn't matter. But in worst case it only partially covers what MIF did. Anyway, we are not lawyers and would appreciate a feedback.
> 
> SG
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:	New Version Notification for draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
> Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:24:22 -0800
> From:	[email-masked]
> To:	Leonardo Jelenkovic <[email-masked]>, Dejan Skvorc <[email-masked]>, Stjepan Gros <[email-masked]>
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Stjepan Gros and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis
> Revision:	00
> Title:		DHCP configuration in MIF and associated IPR claim
> Document date:	2015-11-23
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		11
> URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00.txt
> 
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis/
> 
> Htmlized:       
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sgros-dhcp-and-ipr-claim-analysis-00
> 
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>    The purpose of this draft is to analyze different options on how DHCP
>    can be used to configure PvD aware client.  This is done in light of
>    IPR claim made by Huawei and the necessity to find an option for
>    implementation.  In order for an option to be selected it obviously
>    must not interfere with IPR, or, IPR has to be somehow invalidated.
> 
>                                                                                   
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif