Subject: [Mip4] [Issue 20] Missing description - FA rejection code when MN-HA auth.ext.invalid

From: "Charles E. Perkins" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:16:21 -0800

Hello folks,

Please refer to previous discussion at the following URL:
        http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip4/issue20
as necessary.

The suggestion was to mandate some action on the part of
a foreign agent if no MN-HA authentication extension is
present.  Presumably, this really means, to reject in case
there is no authorization-enabling extension.  But this
should anyway be a rare case, and there is little danger
since the home agent or other authorizing agent will
reject the Request.

I propose that no action be taken, and that the
suggestion to change the specification be rejected.

Comments?

Regards,
Charlie P.

-- 
Mip4 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4