Subject: RE: RE : [Mip6] Justifications for standardizingdraft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt

From: "Soliman, Hesham" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:49:38 -0400

> >  > 
 > >  > on links, where there is no security on the access links, the MN
 > >  > must support IPsec for Route Optimization.
 > > 
 > > => ??? Where did this requirement come from, certainly not 
 > rfc 3775?
 > 
 > RFC 3776
 > 
 >     o  ESP encapsulation of the Home Test Init and Home Test messages
 >        tunneled between the mobile node and home agent MUST 
 > be supported
 >        and SHOULD be used.

=> That doesn't say anything about links. This is a requirement
for all cases.

Hesham

===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6