Subject: RE: [Mip6] [issue13] Should this API contain NEMO API?

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:00:12 -0600

> 
> New submission from Samita <[email-masked]>:
> 
> Ryuji Wakikawa, Ville Nuorvala requested whether NEMO API should go
> with this draft. Ryuji sent some text for the addition.
> 
> Waiting on Chairs' and ADs' decision on this.

Adding NEMO specific aspects to the MIP6 API I-D now which has completed
WG LC is a step backward. I think it is better for the NEMO WG to add
NEMO specific aspects to the advAPI I-D in a separate document. 

-Basavaraj

> 
> ----------
> category: Editorial
> draft: draft-ietf-mip6-mipext-advapi
> messages: 47
> nosy: samita
> priority: May fix
> status: Pending
> title: Should this API contain  NEMO API?
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Mip6 issue tracker <[email-masked]>
> <http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip6/issue13>
> _________________________________________________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mip6 mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
> 
_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6