Subject: Re: [Mobopts] RE: [Mip6] Review Comments and Questions on draft-irtf-mobopts-ro-enhancements-00.txt

From: Christian Vogt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:39:14 +0200

Hi Vidya, hi Wassim,

I added the aspect of independecy from the HA to section 5.9 of
draft-irtf-mobopts-ro-enhancements-00.

- Christian

-- 
Christian Vogt, Institute of Telematics, University of Karlsruhe
www.tm.uka.de/~chvogt/pubkey/

Narayanan Vidya-CVN065 wrote:
> Hi Wassim, Yes, this seems to be the case. I did not see this point
> brought out in draft-irtf-mobopts-ro-enhancements. It might be good
> to add some text about this in the draft.
> 
> Regards, Vidya
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Wassim Haddad
>> [mailto:[email-masked]] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 8:57
>> AM To: Narayanan Vidya-CVN065 Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked] 
>> Subject: Re: [Mip6] Review Comments and Questions on 
>> draft-irtf-mobopts-ro-enhancemen ts-00.txt
>> 
>> 
>> Hello Vidya,
>> 
>> On 26-May-05, at 11:25 PM, Narayanan Vidya-CVN065 wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 3. One of the situations in which RO can be useful is when the RO
>>>  solution allows the MN and CN to continue communication during a
>>>  period of HA unavailability (failure, for e.g.). The current RR
>>>  solution does not achieve this, due to the necessity for short
>>>  lifetimes and hence the need for home address tests via the HA
>>>  every so often. It may be worthwhile adding this to the design
>>>  goals for the solution.
>> 
>> => In OMIPv6, you need to do only *one* HoA test at the beginning.
>>  The shared secret, i.e., SKbm, lifetime is set to 24 hours so that
>>  you don't need to exchange HoTI/HoT messages during this period.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Wassim H.

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6