Subject: RE: [Mip6] comments on draft-ietf-mip6-nemo-v4traversal-00 (2)

From: "Soliman, Hesham" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:38:36 -0500

> > => I don't understand what the issue is. Both are allowed just
 > > like 3775/6.
 > 
 > RFC 3775 and 3776 only show transport mode for BU 

=> We do the same. 

  and
 > MPS in the examples. sending tunnel mode BU has always
 > been a possibility but not explicitly show in RFC 3776.

=> We don't add any restrictions here either, so the same 
applies.

Hesham

===========================================================
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
 of the intended recipient.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly
 prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender
 and delete all copies.
===========================================================

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6