Subject: [MMUSIC] Rtspspec-bugs digest, Vol 1 #37 - 4 msgs

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:14:26 -0700

This is an automatic digest of bugs submitted and changed on the RTSP bug tracker.  To see a list of bugs, visit:

http://sf.net/projects/rtspspec

When replying, please make your Subject line more specific than "Re: Rtspspec-bugs digest"

Today's Topics:

   1. [ rtspspec-Bugs-477423 ] Unclearities regarding pause with range ([email-masked])
   2. [ rtspspec-Bugs-477423 ] Unclearities regarding pause with range ([email-masked])
   3. [ rtspspec-Bugs-557045 ] Need "Supported" header ([email-masked])
   4. [ rtspspec-Bugs-477425 ] Inconsistency between timeformats ([email-masked])

--__--__--

Message: 1
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:16:45 -0700
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-477423 ] Unclearities regarding pause with range

Bugs item #477423, was opened at 2001-11-01 23:45
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477423&group_id=23194

Category: None
Group: Fix - Discussed/Resolved
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Unclearities regarding pause with range

Initial Comment:
How shall the pause point be specifed? Is the only correct way to do it "(start time)- "? The use of 
range with time? It seem to be unecessary as play with range works instead.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2002-05-20 17:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Resolved with the following change:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtspspec/methods.tex.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David W. Walker (davidwwalker)
Date: 2002-02-12 17:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=437905

RESOLVED: Only a single range specifier
(format "value-" where "value" is a time)
is allowed for pause. time="execution time in UTC" may 
also be used, but if multiple range specifiers are 
present, npt/smpte takes precence over time. A new example 
will be provided.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2001-12-13 10:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Does need clarification in specification, but probably warrents discussion.

Recommendation: end time in range is ignored

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477423&group_id=23194

--__--__--

Message: 2
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:17:01 -0700
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-477423 ] Unclearities regarding pause with range

Bugs item #477423, was opened at 2001-11-01 23:45
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477423&group_id=23194

Category: None
>Group: Fixed in CVS/Need WG Approval
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Unclearities regarding pause with range

Initial Comment:
How shall the pause point be specifed? Is the only correct way to do it "(start time)- "? The use of 
range with time? It seem to be unecessary as play with range works instead.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2002-05-20 17:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Resolved with the following change:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtspspec/methods.tex.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David W. Walker (davidwwalker)
Date: 2002-02-12 17:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=437905

RESOLVED: Only a single range specifier
(format "value-" where "value" is a time)
is allowed for pause. time="execution time in UTC" may 
also be used, but if multiple range specifiers are 
present, npt/smpte takes precence over time. A new example 
will be provided.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2001-12-13 10:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Does need clarification in specification, but probably warrents discussion.

Recommendation: end time in range is ignored

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477423&group_id=23194

--__--__--

Message: 3
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:20:29 -0700
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-557045 ] Need "Supported" header

Bugs item #557045, was opened at 2002-05-16 19:05
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=557045&group_id=23194

Category: General
Group: Fix for DS - Need WG Input
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Assigned to: Rob Lanphier (robla)
>Summary: Need "Supported" header

Initial Comment:
This is added to resolve http://rtsp.org/bug477427

There needs to be a way for non-fatal queries which can
be issued with methods.

The current proposal is to use the SIP "Supported" header.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2002-05-20 17:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Current proposal checked into CVS:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtspspec/headers.tex.diff?r1=1.15&r2=1.16

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=557045&group_id=23194

--__--__--

Message: 4
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:54:18 -0700
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-477425 ] Inconsistency between timeformats

Bugs item #477425, was opened at 2001-11-01 23:48
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477425&group_id=23194

Category: None
>Group: Fixed in CVS/Need WG Approval
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Inconsistency between timeformats

Initial Comment:
NPT time in range is allowed to be specifed as "-nptime". No other timeformat allows that, why?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2002-05-20 17:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

Checked into CVS:
Extending "clock=":
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtspspec/parameters.tex.diff?r1=1.6&r2=1.7
Clarifying semantics:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/rtspspec/methods.tex.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David W. Walker (davidwwalker)
Date: 2002-02-12 17:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=437905

RESOLVED: Extend this to other time formats, and probably 
clarify the semantics of this particular syntax. Should 
start at pause point or the beginning.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Date: 2002-01-03 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=302620

I belive we need to to consider how a play with a range "-time" after a pause should be treated. This is 
related to #493265. If #493265 alternative 2 is the agreed behaviour for that issue, the -time range could 
be used to restart a paused media with a given end point. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2001-12-13 10:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

We're pretty sure this is a thinko, and we think that this technique should be extended to the other time 
formats.  Anyone in the working group think differerently?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Date: 2001-12-13 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3796

It's clear we need to extend this to other time formats, and probably clarify the semantics of this particular 
syntax.  As to "why?", it was probably just an oversight; we focused on npt for most of our work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=477425&group_id=23194

End of Rtspspec-bugs Digest

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic