Subject: [MMUSIC] Rtspspec-bugs digest, Vol 1 #57 - 1 msg

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 12:46:24 -0800

This is an automatic digest of bugs submitted and changed on the RTSP bug tracker.  To see a list of bugs, visit:

http://sf.net/projects/rtspspec

When replying, please make your Subject line more specific than "Re: Rtspspec-bugs digest"

Today's Topics:

   1. [ rtspspec-Bugs-631957 ] Use of # and ? in RTSP URLs ([email-masked])

--__--__--

Message: 1
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 00:49:03 -0800
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-631957 ] Use of # and ? in RTSP URLs

Bugs item #631957, was opened at 2002-11-01 09:49
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=631957&group_id=23194

Category: None
Group: Fix for DS - Need WG Input
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Assigned to: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Summary: Use of # and ? in RTSP URLs

Initial Comment:
The current BNF definition does not allow for use of #
(fragments) but use of ? (Query). The text in chapter 3.2: 

"Note that fragment and query identifiers do not have a
well-defined meaning at this time, with the
interpretation left to the RTSP server."

Seems to indicate that it should be allowed. 

How should the be resolved? Add # to url definition and
don't define the behavior. Rewrite the note and say
that they are not allowed. Or do we have any usefull
meaning for it today?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=631957&group_id=23194

End of Rtspspec-bugs Digest

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic