Subject: [MMUSIC] Rtspspec-bugs digest, Vol 1 #59 - 1 msg

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 12:36:18 -0800

This is an automatic digest of bugs submitted and changed on the RTSP bug tracker.  To see a list of bugs, visit:

http://sf.net/projects/rtspspec

When replying, please make your Subject line more specific than "Re: Rtspspec-bugs digest"

Today's Topics:

   1. [ rtspspec-Bugs-633779 ] SET_PARAMETER responses ([email-masked])

--__--__--

Message: 1
To: [email-masked]
From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 04:19:38 -0800
Subject: [rtspspec-bugs] [ rtspspec-Bugs-633779 ] SET_PARAMETER responses

Bugs item #633779, was opened at 2002-11-05 13:19
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=633779&group_id=23194

Category: General
Group: Fix for DS - Need WG Input
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Westerlund (magwes)
Assigned to: Rob Lanphier (robla)
Summary: SET_PARAMETER responses

Initial Comment:
Clarify on the usage of SET_PARAMETER when no body is
present. A correct syntax with unknown headers will
result in a 200 response but also the understanding of
a propreitary or new header will result in 200. Clarify
that a requester should use the Require header with an
option tag to ensure that the responder of the request
really understands the propreitary or new header. 

Also write text recommending on the usage of parameters
in the body with the motivation that they are simpler
than using require and headers. But both case should be
possible to use. 

How to handle a empty parameter list in the body should
also be explained. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=377744&aid=633779&group_id=23194

End of Rtspspec-bugs Digest

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic