Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Re: [AVT] Application sharing - a first protocol dra ft

From: "Francois Audet" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:30:43 -0500

I believe section 4 suggests that normally this would be RTP transported
over TCP, not over UDP.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 15:34
> To: Henning Schulzrinne; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: [MMUSIC] Re: [AVT] Application sharing - a first 
> protocol draft
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting stuff. 
> 
> Why would you use UDP for this?
> 
> Have you had a look at VNC?
> 
> 
> On 1/13/05 10:50 AM, "Henning Schulzrinne" 
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > We have put together an initial draft on how to do applicationg 
> > sharing, at the pixel level. For reasons discussed also in 
> our earlier 
> > requirements document 
> > 
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schulzrinne-mmusic-sharing-
> > 00.txt),
> > we believe that this is closely related to remote access to 
> applications
> > and that timing information is relevant. Thus, the initial draft
> > primarily defines RTP payload types. Until the draft appears in the
> > archives, you can find it at
> > 
> > 
> http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~lennox/draft-lennox-avt-app-sharing-00.tx
> > t
> > 
> > Note that this type of application sharing is 
> application-neutral and 
> > application-unaware, i.e., this is not a "shared whiteboard" or 
> > "shared editor" protocol.
> > 
> > We would appreciate your comments and suggestions.
> > 
> > Henning
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic