Subject: (mobile-ip) Re: Ballot: Reverse Tunneling for Mobile IP to Proposed Standard

From: Gabriel Montenegro <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 13:11:22 -0700 (PDT)

Thomas Narten graciously reviewed our draft for the IESG.
I just submitted a new (and hopefully final) version of the
draft incorporating his comments. There's nothing major
so this time the document should proceed smoothly.

-gabriel

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes between rev 05 and 06:

1. reference to IAB removed, as it seems like RFC 2267 is not
   related to that organization.

2. added definition of MUST/MAY/SHOULD as per RFC 2119

3. HA "MAY" check for mobility binding governing reverse tunneled
   packets changed to a "MUST". Also added some more text justifying
   this and making it configurable.

4. typo fixed. this:

>      - The TTL of packets sent by the mobile node (particularly when
>        sends packets to other hosts in its home network) may be so low

   was changed to:
   
>      - The TTL of packets sent by the mobile node (for example when 
>        sending packets to other hosts in its home network) may be so

5. Took care of the spelling error Thomas Narten brought up, as well
   as another one I spotted.
   
6. changed "i.e." to "that is" and "e.g." to "for example" (except
   where it is part of quoted text).

-gabriel

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF Mobile IP Working Group Mailing List - Archives:  software.watson.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:	unsubscribe mobile-ip		(as message body, not subject)
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]