Subject: some queries on mpls-ftn-mib-03

From: "Sharma, Prem" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:11:20 -0700

Hi,

I was trying to see if some consensus has been reached on the following
outstanding issues w.r.t. mpls-ftn-mib:
*	Keeping mapping of DSCP values to LSPs/Tunnels 
*	Use of CIDR prefixes instead of Address ranges.
*	Keeping IPv6 flow label also. 

Aforementioned pertain to the mplsFTNEntry in the MIB.
One more comment: I'll be better if the relation of this draft with diffserv
mib could be clarified too.

Thanks.
Prem