Subject: RE: info: cr-ldp discussion to take place on the mpls list

From: "Osama Aboul-Magd" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 07:11:50 -0400

During the MPLS WG meeting in Yokohama the argument made that no customer is
asking for CR-LDP. The argument was basically made by a router vendor and
few carriers, and it was clear it is only applicable in the packet space.

In the context of GMPLS, there hasn't been much deployment of anything. The
survey that has been conducted only reflects vendor preference and is not
indicative of future carrier deployment of RSVP-TE or CR-LDP. In fact the
only carrier that is on the record supports neither.

So the question is why is the rush? If a year from now we find out that
RSVP-TE is deployed every where in the optical layer, then no one can argue
then. But it is premature to make a decision now.

Regards;

Osama Aboul-Magd
Nortel Networks
P.O. Box 3511, Station "C"
Ottawa, ON, Canada
K1Y - 4H7
Tel: 613-763-5827
e.mail: [email-masked]

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Loa Andersson [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent:	Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:42 AM
To:	ccamp; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject:	info:  cr-ldp discussion to take place on the mpls list

All,

this message is sent to the ccamp, ppvpn and pwe3 wg mailing lists
as information, plese do not reply to the list(s).

At the mpls wg meeting today the issue of having two functionally
similar protocols for te and setting up expicit routes (rsvp-te and
cr-ldp), a discussion were initiated and it was decided that it shall
take place on the mpls wg mailing <mpls@uu-net>.

As separate message will be sent to the mpls list with further
background.

/Loa

-- 
     Loa Andersson
     Chief Architect,
     Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
     Utfors AB
     Råsundavägen 12
     Box 525, 169 29 Solna
     Office          +46 8 5270 2000
     Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
     Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
     Email           [email-masked]
     WWW             www.utfors.se