Subject: Re: [mpls] Comments on draft-vasseur-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps-00 ?

From: "Yuichi Ikejiri" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:36:39 +0900

Hi,

I would like to support this draft. This draft would be very useful to
allow us to load balance lsps across the whole network from the
perspective of a service provider. In addition, JL's suggention would be
also useful when we use 0bw lsps and non-0bw lsps in the network.

Thanks,
Yuichi

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:15:09 -0600
"JP Vasseur" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Dear WG,
> 
> Right after the presentation this morning, it was suggested to gather  
> feed-back on the usefulness of this ID before moving forward. I got  
> some feed-back off-line and on-line (Kenji - KDDI).
> 
> Could you tell me whether you think that it is worth being pursed ?
> 
> Send comments if any.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls