Subject: [mpls] AD review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:38:56 +0100

Hi,

I have done my AD review of this document. In view of the fact that my comments
are quite small, could you please handle them as part of the IETF last call
which I will start forthwith.

Thanks,
Adrian

---
   
You seem to be missing a section on MEP_IDs for MPLS_TP Sections.
Insert before 7.2.1?

---

Nits

1.3

OLD
The notation does define a preferred ordering of the fields.
NEW
The notation defines a preferred ordering of the fields.
END

OLD
 Z9 is used to indicated the
NEW
 Z9 is used to indicate the
END