Subject: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3031 (5002)

From: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:39:55 -0700 (PDT)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3031,
"Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3031&eid=5002

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Eric Gray <[email-masked]>

Section: 3.8

Original Text
-------------
   Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing
   changes, but conservative label retention mode though requires an LSR
   to maintain many fewer labels.

Corrected Text
--------------
   Liberal label retention mode allows for quicker adaptation to routing
   changes, while conservative label retention mode requires an LSR to
   maintain many fewer labels.

Notes
-----
Grammar error in original text, which may make it harder for some to read and understand.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3031 (draft-ietf-mpls-arch-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture
Publication Date    : January 2001
Author(s)           : E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG