Subject: [Nea] My schema comments from today

From: Leif Johansson <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:36:55 +0100

Since the chairs encouraged people who went up to the mic
today to copy suggestions/requirements to the list here are
my 5c:

It should imo be a requirement for NEA not to define a new
schema language for attributes. After listening to the discussion
and reading the requirements document it seems absolutely
clear to me that schema in some form is needed and since
schema is hard to get right I advocate using an existing schema
language instead of inventing another one.

    Cheers Leif

_______________________________________________
Nea mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea