Subject: Re: [MEXT] [Recharter.2]

From: "xuke" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:14:37 +0800

Hi All,

I would like to support:

[CR] Interaction between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE by PF_KEY extensions

Regards,

xuke
Tsinghua University

>On Feb 12, 2008 7:31 AM, Julien Laganier <julien.IETF at laposte.net> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> This is the next step in the recharter process. We'd like to get input
>> from WG participants on what should be the items included in
>> rechartering, what are their priorities, and who is willing to
>> sustain the effort. When that step is completed we will take the WG
>> input and discuss with our AD to move forward with deciding what to
>> include or not in the charter. Your input should be sent to the list
>> during the following two weeks, by 2008-02-26.
>>
>> Please pick from the list of items below the items you think the WG
>> should work on, and order them in decreasing priority (just to make
>> sure, first priority items goes first in the list you're making :).
>>
>> List of items:
>>
>> Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
>> MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
>> IP Tunneling Optimization in a Mobile Environment
>> Generic Notification Message for Mobile IPv6
>> GRE requirements for IPv6 mobility
>> 4283bis to extend MN identifier to other identifiers
>> Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping for the Authentication Option Protocol
>> Interaction between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE by PF_KEY extensions
>> Virtual Home Link configuration for Mobile IPv6
>> Extend DSMIPv6 Home Network Support
>>
>> Also, please prefix each of the items in your list with the letters E, C
>> and/or R if you're willing to:
>>
>> - [E]dit: Are you willing to edit the draft corresponding to the
>>   item.
>>
>> - [C]ontribute: Are you willing to propose text for the draft.
>>
>> - [R]eview: Are you willing to review new revisions of the draft when
>>   being asked by the chairs.
>>
>> As an example, that could be one input list:
>>
>> E MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
>> CR Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
>> R IP Tunneling Optimization in a Mobile Environment
>>
>> meaning that the MIPv6 home link is first priority and you volunteer to
>> edit, Binding revocation is second priority and you're willing to
>> contribute and review, while IP tunneling optimization is third
>> priority and you're willing to review.
>>
>> Hope this is understandable :)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- julien and marcello, MEXT chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT at ietf.org
>> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext