Subject: close-session

From: noe <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:08:27 +0100

Hello again,

       I am a bit confused about the <close-session>  operation. Is 
there a significance for the initiator to not to close the session 
itself but instead assign this job to the peer?
       It can send a close-session to the peer and trigger it to release 
the locks and resources associated to that connection and then when it 
gets the "ok" it can itself close the session. Do you think this would 
lead to any problems ?

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>