Subject: Re: [netconf] WGLC on on draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server

From: Mahesh Jethanandani <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:46:29 -0700

We did not receive any additional comments on this draft and the restconf-client-server draft. At this time, we are going ahead and closing the LC on the two drafts.

For the remaining drafts, the author(s) have indicated that they need to update some of the drafts to address two issues that were raised during their LC. They are:

raw-public-key and PSK in TLS 1.3. Henk, can you help?
The language in the keystore/truststore drafts does not preclude the ability for “built-in” keys/anchors to be in a <system> datastore.

Once the drafts are updated, we believe we should be ready with publication.

Cheers.

> On Sep 24, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> No comments have been received on this or the restconf client/server draft. This could be because the drafts were some of the early drafts, and have been reviewed multiple times in their lifetime. All the same, we will extend this LC for another week to get any comments on the two drafts. If no comments or objections are received by then, we will proceed with the publication of the two drafts.
> 
>> On Aug 25, 2021, at 8:44 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
>> 
>> We are starting a 3 week WGLC on draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server version 23. The extra week because the US is coming up to some holidays in that time period. The document can be found here:
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-client-server/>
>> 
>> Please respond on this thread indicating your support or concerns about why this document should/should not be adopted.
>> 
>> We are particularly interested in statement of the form:
>> 
>> - I have reviewed the draft and found no issues. 
>> - I have reviewed the draft and found the following issues …
>> 
>> This WGLC will conclude on Wednesday, September 15. An IPR call will be issued separately.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)

Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)