Subject: [nfsv4] more re: lock_owner re-use

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:00:14 -0400 (EDT)

> operation. And despite the subject of this thread, the issue is open_owners,
> lock_owners.

Yes, I meant "open_owner". In my defence, I will note that the term lock_owner
is used throughout Sec. 8, up until 8.1.8, where open_owner makes its first
appearance.

Glad to see I stirred up a little controversy. Looks like Door #1 is the
winner sofar, rick

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4