Subject: RE: req proposal (was Re: [NSIS] NSIS Requirement: Independence ofexisting flow reservations and default routing

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:29:07 +0300

Hi Marco & Marcus,
> We discussed the issue of route pinning and traffic engineering in 
> Helsinki. The conclusion during the meeting was that we want to add an 
> assuption saying: NSIS assumes normal/standard L3 routing
> 
> Plus we add a requirement saying that NSIS protocol should not be broken by 
> networks which do non-traditional L3 routing.
> 
> Does this cover your concern? Do we really need to add that NSIS must work 
> with default routing changes?

I agree with Marcus that this is what we are trying to say.  Marco, is this
text OK with you?

John

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis