Subject: [OPSAWG] Working Group meeting format going forward

From: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:07:28 +1100

Greetings,

	Scott and I would like to try and get away from the current IETF power-point disease and return the meetings to a more interactive model.  As such, we are proposing (actually driving for this next meeting) some changes.  We'd like the wg input as to if this (or some other model) should be the approach going forward:

1) Assume that everyone in the room has read the draft.  This means no re-reading of the draft or extended summary.  A few contextual points are acceptable.
2) You are allowed two slides - use them judiciously - phrase the question you want discussed, or have a network diagram that illustrates a point.  If more diagrams are necessary (not text), some latitude will be allowed.
3) What do you want the working group to do - why are you taking a slot of time?  That should be the focus of your time allotted.  Ask the question, pose the conundrum, and then open for discussion.  Presentations that are short on presentation, and long on two-way discussion in the room are preferential to a full 10 minutes of unidirectional broadcast.

	Comments and suggestions are welcome

	Chris

---
李柯睿
Check my PGP key here:
https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc