Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Accepted as WG Document

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:39:33 +0000

Authors – additionally, please confirm whether or not you are aware of IPR related to this draft.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Acee Lindem <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 at 2:25 PM
To: OSPF WG List <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Manav Bhatia <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Sam Aldrin <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, Trilok Ranganatha <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Accepted as WG Document

We have received anonymous support for the subject document and it is required for the Seamless BFD work in the BFD WG. Hence, we are accepting it as a WG document.

Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-ospf-bfd-descriminator-00.txt.
Thanks,
Acee

---

From: Manav Bhatia <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 05:05:41 +0530

Hi Acee,

No IPR from my side.

Cheers, Manav

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email-masked]> wrote:
> From: Acee Lindem <[email-masked]>
> To: OSPF WG List <[email-masked]>, Manav Bhatia <[email-masked]>,
> "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email-masked]>, Sam Aldrin
> <[email-masked]>, Trilok Ranganatha
> <[email-masked]>
> We have received anonymous support for the subject document and it is
> required for the Seamless BFD work in the BFD WG. Hence, we are accepting it
> as a WG document.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

---

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 07:54:47 +0000

Acee,

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Thanks!

Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows

On Sep 25, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote: