Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft

From: Jiangyuanlong <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:21:36 +0000

Support.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Gregory Mirsky
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 9:39 AM
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft

yes/support

The document addresses realistic in MPLS-TP network case when ICCP cannot be used to coordinate state within PE redundancy group. Using G-ACh is logical approach then.

	Regards,
		Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Pals [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:37 AM
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Subject: [Pals] Poll to determine consensus for adoption of draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as WG draft

Working Group,

This email starts a poll to see whether there is consensus to adopt draft-cheng-pwe3-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination as a WG draft of the PALS WG.

Please send your comments (support/not support) to the PALS working group mailing list ([email-masked]). Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be adopted as a working group document.

This poll will conclude on 9th March 2015

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

_______________________________________________
Pals mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals