Subject: [paws] Summary: Comments on draft-07

From: Vincent Chen <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:50:41 -0800

All,

I believe the open issues for which there is support for change are:

 1. Remove TBDs, except for the mailing-list name for PAWS IANA reviews

   - Ruleset name for ETSI draft, e.g., "ETSI-EN-301-598-1.0.0-draft"
   - Hyperlink to the ETSI draft

 2. vCard
   - Move regulatory requirements to the Ruleset sections, such as which
fields
     are required.
   - "fn" should be "formatted name", not "full name"
   - Add an example for representing an organization

 3. Shortened names
   - If accepted, would shorten just the names of the fields in the
inner-most loop of the
     spectrum response:

     freqHz -> hz
     powerDbmPerBw -> dbm

     It does not seem that other fields appear often enough to have
significant impact

Should I go ahead and make these changes and try last-call again?

-- 
-vince