Subject: [Pce] PCE WG contributions

From: "Dipnarayan Guha" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:22:01 +0900 (KST)

<diV align=left>Hi JP, Adrian and members of the PCE Community,</diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left>We would like to contribute to the aspects of the PCE WG charter on the following points:</diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left>1. protocols for PCE-based path computation techniques</diV>
<diV align=left>2. protocols for communication between PCEs and PCC with focus upon lesser computational costs in path computation techniques across multiple administrative domains</diV>
<diV align=left>3. security issues and protocol extensions (this is quite an important feature of the WG charter)</diV>
<diV align=left>4. MIB definition and requirements. (This is something that has to be worked out. We can work with Emile on this and other management criteria)</diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left>We have already submitted a couple of drafts related to Point 2 for the bygone&nbsp;PCE BOF, for example: </diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left><U><FONT color=#800080><A href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-choi-pce-metric-protocol-00.txt">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-choi-pce-metric-protocol-00.txt</A></FONT></U><A href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-choi-pce-metric-protocol-00.txt"></A></diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left>Please let us know what you think about this. </diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left>Thanks, </diV>
<diV align=left>&nbsp;</diV>
<diV align=left>Dip</diV>

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce