Subject: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-architecture-00

From: Vivek Dubey-G20041 <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:30:36 +0530

Hi,

Section 6.4 : Multiple PCE Path Computation with Inter-PCE Communication:
The PCE in Section 5.3 was 
>> should be "6.3"

Section 7.1: Centralized Computation Model
>> Does Centralized Computation Model provides for backup/standby PCE. If so, it should be mentioned here

Section 7.3: Synchronization
In this case of non-synchronized path computation, the path computation
of a set of TE LSPs can be shared among a set of PCEs (that is, one path
computed by each PCE).
>> This sharing decision can be made by PCE or PCC or either?

Section 7.3: Synchronization
each PCE can be backed up by one or more PCEs, should it fail
>> more PCEs mean how many? Any specific reason to provide for more than one backup PCEs.

Section 7.4: PCE Discovery and Load Balancing
The PCE architecture requires that the PCC knows the location of 
>> The PCE architecture requires that the PCC/PCE knows the location of

Section 7.4: PCE Discovery and Load Balancing
This information would help a PCC that dynamically learns about PCEs available on the network to decide which of them to use
>> PCC/PCE

Section 7.5: Detecting PCE Liveness
the inability of a PCE to service a request (perhaps due to excessive load) may be determined by the PCC through the use of timers
>> Failure message from PCE would be better. 

Section 7.8: Stateful Versus Stateless PCEs
in Section 6.7 also come into play
>> Should be Section 7.7

Section 7.10: Policy and Confidentiality
As mentioned in section 6.9
>> No such section

Thanks
Vivek

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce