Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document

From: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:34:55 +0000

Support (co-author).

On 2014-03-04 11:51, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support 
> for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
> as a PCE WG.
>
> Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG document ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP and Julien.
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: [email-masked]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [email-masked]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:27:02 +0100
From: Cyril Margaria <[email-masked]>
To: Leeyoung <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG
	Document ?
Message-ID:
	<[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

support

On 5 March 2014 14:05, Leeyoung <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Support.
>
> Young
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur 
> (jvasseur)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:48 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support 
> for adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document, as usual, we 
> would like to confirm on the mailing list.
>
> Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of 
> adopting
> draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP and Julien.
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/attachments/20140305/5abcd899/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:27:41 +0100
From: Cyril Margaria <[email-masked]>
To: Leeyoung <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of
	draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?
Message-ID:
	<CADOd8-u-YM9n=BEtrTmMxLue+FWwjMGD1XyYSt9=[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Support

On 5 March 2014 14:05, Leeyoung <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Support.
>
> Young
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:12 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations 
> as PCE WG Document?
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for 
> adopting draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 as a PCE WG item.
>
> Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of 
> adopting it as a WG document?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP and Julien.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/attachments/20140305/b05b1c7f/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:28:10 +0100
From: Cyril Margaria <[email-masked]>
To: Qin Wu <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Pce] ??: Adoption of
	draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?
Message-ID:
	<CADOd8-um7iiuYyPN-XaywQA5xYjOOW_eyjT=[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Support

On 4 March 2014 23:30, Qin Wu <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Support.
>
> -----????-----
> ???: Pce [mailto:[email-masked]] ?? Zafar Ali (zali)
> ????: 2014?3?4? 22:22
> ???: JP Vasseur (jvasseur); [email-masked]
> ??: Re: [Pce] Adoption of 
> draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
> as PCE WG Document ?
>
> Hi-
>
> Support (as a co-author).
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards ? Zafar
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "JP Vasseur   (jvasseur)" <[email-masked]>
> Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 5:51 AM
> To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of 
> draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
> as PCE WG Document ?
>
> >Dear WG,
> >
> >As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some 
> >support for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt
> >as a PCE WG.
> >
> >Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of 
> >adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG 
> >document ?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >JP and Julien.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Pce mailing list
> >[email-masked]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/attachments/20140305/814b558e/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

------------------------------

End of Pce Digest, Vol 114, Issue 13
************************************