Subject: Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

From: Andrew Veitch <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 20:36:21 +0000

Hi,

Is there an update regarding this draft and/or any additional supporting work needed?   Thanks.

Andy

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
"Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> Tue, 03 May 2016 19:16 UTC

Hi Ina,
Great that you have this under control.

Looks like "review and review" are the actions on me.
Will do.

Cheers,
Adrian

From: Ina Minei [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: 02 May 2016 17:17
To: 'Adrian Farrel' ([email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>)
Cc: pce; [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

Adrian,

Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am aware that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the unfinished thread (  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) , please let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring to. Thank you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the cracks on my end.

Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would be appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I
am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want to make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft.

Thank you,

Ina

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
   some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian

________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.