Subject: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.

From: "Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:57:34 +0000

Dear Chairs

Looking at the wiki page there was a comment on the sr-p2mp-policy draft.

draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy>
109; More work is needed - align to PCECC, text needs to aligned to the PCE WG style

The authors took an action to setup a meeting and discuss the alignment with PCECC farther. The final outcome of this meeting was unanimous agreement, by all the authors/vendors on the draft, to go forward with ERO object.

The authors feel ERO object in addition to draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-04 - PCEP Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information (ietf.org)<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-04> for backup paths is the easiest and the most efficient way to address the programming of a replication segment on PCC from to the PCE.

The authors would like to move forward with the adaptation call please. In addition the authors are open to discuss the ERO preference in an interim open session with the chairs.

Regards
Hooman