Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-rajagapolan-pce-pcep-color-00 -- Placement of the color TLV

From: Balaji Rajagopalan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 06:05:41 +0000

Hi,

Would like to follow up on my earlier request in the email below for WG adoption of this draft. We’ve addressed all the comments received so far, and it appears that the draft is stable enough for WG adoption. Happy to hear further comments/suggestions.

--
Balaji Rajagopalan

From: Pce <[email-masked]> on behalf of Balaji Rajagopalan <balajir=[email-masked]>
Date: Monday, 15 November 2021 at 12:51 PM
To: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>, [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-rajagapolan-pce-pcep-color-00 -- Placement of the color TLV
[External Email. Be cautious of content]

I’ve addressed the comments received so far in the following version of the draft:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-01.txt<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-01.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VCbw_jy4K5AcelQXs3FT35JAcmjS2nLQb2Mwi2PdjvvPgQWnX_KNTBSVZkc6-esF$>

In specific, following is the text from the updated draft that addresses Dhruv’s comment:

“
Section 4 defines the format of the color TLV.  The placement of the
TLV depends on the purpose for which it is used.  For RSVP's service
mapping use case discussed in this document, the color TLV is carried
in the LSP Object defined in [RFC8231].
“

Believe the document is now ready for WG adoption.

--
Balaji Rajagopalan

From: Pce <[email-masked]> on behalf of Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[email-masked]>
Date: Friday, 12 November 2021 at 10:46 PM
To: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Pce] draft-rajagapolan-pce-pcep-color-00 -- Placement of the color TLV
[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Dhruv had a question in today's session on where the color TLV needs to be placed. The placement of the TLV depends on the use-case. For the RSVP-TE service-mapping use-case discussed in this document, the TLV would be placed in the LSP object. For the multipath use-case, it would be in PATH-ATTRIB object.

Section 3 of the document does says this:

   The actual color value itself is carried in a newly defined TLV in

   the LSP Object defined in [RFC8231<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8231__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Qqn-6T0hVcuzUnfP4hnoiLJ2pb056ht_Ggk0EX_8Npz71_pux2l0WPMrEyilJcA_$>].

This needs to move to Section 2.

Regards,

-Pavan

Juniper Business Use Only

Juniper Business Use Only

Juniper Business Use Only