Subject: [Pce] [Errata Verified] RFC8664 (6753)

From: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:14:47 -0800 (PST)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8664,
"Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6753

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Shuping Peng <[email-masked]>
Date Reported: 2021-11-25
Verified by: John Scudder (IESG)

Section: 4.3.1

Original Text
-------------
If the F bit is set to zero
      (see below), then the NT field has no meaning and MUST be ignored
      by the receiver. 

Corrected Text
--------------
If the F bit is set to one
      (see below), then the NT field has no meaning and MUST be ignored
      by the receiver. 

Notes
-----
Later it says, when this F bit is set to 1, the NAI value is absent, so the NT field has no meaning. 
     F:   When this bit is set to 1, the NAI value in the subobject
           body is absent.  The F bit MUST be set to 1 if NT=0;
           otherwise, it MUST be set to zero.  The S and F bits MUST NOT
           both be set to 1.

--------------------------------------
RFC8664 (draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing
Publication Date    : December 2019
Author(s)           : S. Sivabalan, C. Filsfils, J. Tantsura, W. Henderickx, J. Hardwick
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Path Computation Element
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG