Subject: Re: [pim] [PIM]New Version Notification for, draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt

From: 顾戎 <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:01:37 +0000

Hi, dear all.

I do also think that new ideas need to be welcomed and good ideas need to be pay attention to. It's shown in the draft of the IGP multicast architecture that IGP provides more efficient in routing IP unicast and multicast packets and some applications are noted which are interesting.

Rong Gu

[email-masked]

> From: pim [[email-masked]] on behalf of saeed sami [[email-masked]]
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 7:01
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [pim] [PIM]New Version Notification for, draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
> 
> Hi.
> After reading the draft i must say that the idea and the procedures
> explained in it are well formed and mature to begin the work on this
> kind of routing protocols and it will be a good step for the WG to work
> on new ideas like this.
> 
> having a Routing protocol capable of handling both unicast and multicast
> will make administration a lot easier and will be beneficial. but it
> will need the WG to become ready for new ideas and unfortunately
> everything has beed focused on PIM-SM RFC4601 - bis4601 atleast in the
> past 12 months and it seems that no one is interested in new ideas which
> might improve multicast routing if guided in the right direction.
> 
> I hope draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00 gets noticed and WG shows
> some interest to work on it or other new drafts like draft-sami-pim-ng.
> 
> 
> 
> On 03/05/2015 11:30 ب.ظ, [email-masked] wrote:
> > New Version Notification for
> > draft-yong-pim-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pim mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim
> 
> 
>