Subject: [pim] draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-05

From: "Sowmya Krishnaswamy (sowkrish)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 07:00:27 +0000

Dear all,

We got consensus to support the explicit RPF vector function in previous meetings and this mailing list. We have addressed the questions and suggestions from the WG.

There are a few minor changes to the text from the previous version.

The main clarification is in section 1 where we state that the draft does not introduce any new mechanism in PIM to validate the correctness of the RPF vectors. It is upto the mechanisms that produced the Explicit RPF vectors to ensure they are correct. Existing mechanisms like [I-D.ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2] may be used to verify how the PIM tree was built. There are other minor editorial changes in Figure.1.

Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-05

We hope that the revised document now is ready for publication.

Best Regards,

Sowmya