Subject: [pim] Hi Med, we have discussed the pending action on our regular meeting.

From: Hongji Zhao <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 03:01:10 +0000

Hi Med,

 We have discussed the pending action on our regular meeting.  RFC8114 introduces the IGMP-MLD Interworking Function. In Figure 2, mB4 performs this function. It combines the IGMP/MLD Proxying function and the address-synthesizing operations.
 So the IGMP-MLD Interworking Function is an application of igmp/mld proxy.

 We think the igmp/mld proxy model should try to address common things, and it is not proper to take account into the IGMP-MLD Interworking Function now.
 
 How many vendors have implement the IGMP-MLD Interworking Function in RFC8114?  Thanks a lot!
 
+----------+ IGMP    +---------+     MLD        +---------+
| IPv4     |-----------| mB4   |----------------| PIM    |
| Rev      |              |             |                     | DR      |
+----------+              +---------+                     +---------+
Figure 2: IGMP-MLD Interworking

BR/Hongji

-----Original Message-----
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:16:32 +0000
From: <[email-masked]>
To: Stig Venaas <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, JACQUENET Christian TGI/OLN
	<[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [pim] Adoption call for
	draft-zhao-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-03.txt
Message-ID:
	<[email-masked]>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Stig, all,

I support.

There is still a pending action from the authors to address the comment at:
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=69f18971-352582da-69f1c9ea-864b0d136b87-58fb1825031d20ba&q=1&e=7b7757a9-5dd6-4e35-9655-739937ec8f2d&u=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fpim%2FDrMDlsJXnVl3BW7sQM-QeIZRNvo

I hope the comment will be addressed in the next iteration of the draft.

Cheers,
Med

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 1:32 PM Stig Venaas <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
Hi

As discussed last meeting, we are doing an adoption call for draft-zhao-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-03.txt.

Please respond by October 25th whether you think this draft should be adopted as a WG item.

Stig

_______________________________________________
pim mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=68d33e76-340735dd-68d37eed-864b0d136b87-805b21d5905e9cea&q=1&e=7b7757a9-5dd6-4e35-9655-739937ec8f2d&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpim