Subject: Re: [pim] pim Digest, Vol 213, Issue 2

From: "Stevens, Jim A Collins" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 06:37:06 +0000

In response to
        Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 19:11:30 +0000
        From: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <[email-masked]>
        To: Michael McBride <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]"
                <[email-masked]>
        Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
        Subject: Re: [pim] Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

I appreciate section 3 terminology that defines terms, but it leaves out DC which appears to be the key application that this draft RFC applies to.  I'm guessing from reading referenced RFC 7432 that DC stands for a Data Center.
Recommend adding DC to section 3.

Jim Stevens

---

From: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:49:34 +0000

Thanks for comment, I would take care of it.

From: Stevens, Jim A Collins <[email-masked]>
Date: Friday, January 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM
To: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
Cc: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: pim Digest, Vol 213, Issue 2
In response to
        Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 19:11:30 +0000
        From: "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)" <[email-masked]>
        To: Michael McBride <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]"
                <[email-masked]>
        Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
        Subject: Re: [pim] Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy

Jim Stevens