Subject: Re: Cached OCSP responses vs. single entry CRLs

From: [email-masked] (Peter Gutmann)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:11:52 +1300

"Carl Wallace" <[email-masked]> writes:

>Why use OCSP to convey pre-produced revocation information in the way that's
>being discussed?  Why not use single entry CRLs?  The functionality is
>similar and they could be propagated using existing technology (e.g.
>directories, 3280 compliant path processing clients, etc.).

Shhhh!!!  You're not supposed to ask that question.

Peter.