Subject: Re: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis-01: Section 2

From: Peter Sylvester <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:37:32 +0200 (MEST)

I realized that the following did not get to the list.

> >Also, 3280 is under revision, if it happens that the corresponding text
> >gets clarified in some way, one would have something considered
> >unprecise elsewhere.
>
> I do not understand the harm that you believe is being caused.

The same type as with the text in 3370 can be definetely avoided
by not copying text which may be subject to clarifications.

If clarifications (not changes!!) are made in rfc3280bis in
order to address common misunderstandings or unprecise
wording in the majority of non-native english speaking world,
then these updates don't get into the other text.