Subject: [Fwd: RE: [Policy] Re: IP Protocol value range]

From: "Mircea Pana"<[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 13:56:48 -0500

Bob,

I find the proposed text to be specific enough to make it unambiguous.
Maybe, just for the record, instead of "802.2" you could add "the IEEE
802.2".

Thanks,
Mircea.

-------- Original Message --------
From: "Robert Moore" <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [Policy] Re: IP Protocol value range
To: "Ron Cohen" <[email-masked]>
CC: [email-masked],"Pana, Mircea
[CAR:5E30:EXCH]"<[email-masked]>,"'IETF Policy'"
<[email-masked]>, [email-masked]

--1__=0ABBE1C4DFF2676A8f9e8a93df938690918c0ABBE1C4DFF2676A
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Let me propose an update to the PCIMe text. If this isn't exactly right,
it should at least be specific enough for people to comment on.
It's a complete replacement for section 5.12.19:

	NAME PolicySNAPTypeVariable
DESCRIPTION The value of the Sub-Network Access Protocol 
                   (SNAP) Type field for 802.2 SNAP encapsulation.

ALLOWED VALUE TYPES:
 - PolicyIntegerValue (0..65535)
 - PolicyBitStringValue (16 bit)

DERIVED FROM PolicyImplicitVariable
ABSTRACT FALSE 
PROPERTIES (none)

Regards,
Bob

Bob Moore
Advanced Design and Technology
Application Integration Middleware Division
IBM Software Group
+1-919-254-4436
[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy