Subject: [Policy] CIM Extention doubt

From: "Girish Pujari" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:26:53 +0530

Pana Mircea your suggestion for LDAP implementation was greate help and it works fine.
Thanx a lot.

I have few querries in the PCIMe.

The representation of schema in different Policy information models (CIM,LDAP,PIB)
does it follow the same methodology or heirachy of classes ?.Do we need to maintain the same class hierachy for common standards ?

We have SimplePolicyCondition which contains the PolicyVariable , PolicyValue and Matching a operator.

These Policy variable/Value can take the form of any variable ( DSCP,IPADDRESS,BW,QueueAlgorithm etc)
and value (int ,long ....) 

In case of LDAP does any standard strictly say that the heirachy is PolicyGroup -> PolicyRule -> PolicyCondition -> PolicyVariable/Value.?

Thanx
Regards

Girish Pujari

*********************************************************
Disclaimer

This message (including any attachments) contains 
confidential information intended for a specific 
individual and purpose, and is protected by law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should 
delete this message and are hereby notified that 
any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, 
is strictly prohibited.

*********************************************************
Visit us at http://www.mahindrabt.com