Subject: [precis] result of a comparison of a code point table in draft-saintandre-precis-codepoints-00 with my code point table

From: Takahiro Nemoto <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:22:55 -1000

Hi, Peter-san

I’ve checked the code point table in draft-saintandre-precis-codepoints-00 too.
And I found several mistakes in writing and corrected these mistakes as following.

#1
 0A35.OA36   ; PVALID      # GURMUKHI LET VA..GURMUKHI LET SHA
->   0A35..0A36   ; PVALID      # GURMUKHI LET VA..GURMUKHI LET SHA

#2
 0EE0..0EEF  ; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
 0F00        ; PVALID      # TIB SYLL OM
->   0EE0..0EFF  ; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
->   0F00        ; PVALID      # TIB SYLL OM

#3
 2100..2129;FREE_PVAL#ACCOUNTOF..TURNEDGREEKSMLETIOT
 212A..212B;PVALID#KELVINSIGN..ANGSTROMSIGN
 212C..2125;FREE_PVAL#SCRIPTCAPC..OUNCESIGN
 2126;PVALID#OHMSIGN
 2127..2131;FREE_PVAL#INVERTEDOHMSIGN..SCRIPTCAPF
->   2100..2131;FREE_PVAL#ACCOUNTOF..SCRIPTCAPF

#4
 110D0..110F8; PVALID      # SORA SOMPENG LETTER SAH..SORA SOMPE
 110F9..110EF; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
 110F0..110F9; PVALID      # SORA SOMPENG DIG ZERO..SORA SOMPENG DI
->   110D0..110E8; PVALID      # SORA SOMPENG LETTER SAH..SORA SOMPE
->   110E9..110EF; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
->   110F0..110F9; PVALID      # SORA SOMPENG DIG ZERO..SORA SOMPENG DI

#5
 116CA..1FFFF; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
 12000..1236E; PVALID      # CUNEI SIGN A..CUNEI SIGN ZUM
->   116CA..11FFF; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
->   12000..1236E; PVALID      # CUNEI SIGN A..CUNEI SIGN ZUM

#6
「1F645..1F64F」
 1F645..1F650; FREE_PVAL   # FACE W NO GOOD GESTURE..PERSON W FO
 1F650..1F67F; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
->   1F645..1F67F;FREE_PVAL#FACEWNOGOODGESTURE..REVERSE CHECKER BOARD

#7
 2A700..2B734; PVALID      # <CJK Ideograph Extension C>
 2A735..2A739; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
 2A740..2B81D; PVALID      # <CJK Ideograph Extension D>
->   2A700..2B734; PVALID      # <CJK Ideograph Extension C>
->   2B735..2B73F; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
->   2B740..2B81D; PVALID      # <CJK Ideograph Extension D>

And I've compared the revised table with my table, which had been generated from my code.
Kindly please see attached diff files for reference. 
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Regards,
nemo

--
Takahiro Nemoto
[email-masked]